Sign up here to
receive our e-alerts





May 14 , 2003
E-mail this page to a friend


Prop. 36 'Realignment' Deferred, Probably Dead As a Concept

Gov. Davis Drops Proposal to Shift Prop. 36 to Counties Amid Legal Hurdles, Opposition by Legislators and Initiative Sponsors


Contact: Roberta Green, Campaign for New Drug Policies
310 394-2952, or Whitney Taylor, Drug Policy Alliance: (916) 444-3751

SACRAMENTO, May 14 - Gov. Gray Davis effectively conceded defeat today in his effort to force "realignment" of Prop. 36 funds and programs, with his May revision of the budget punting the concept until next year.

Bill Zimmerman, who managed the campaign for Prop. 36 and serves on the Statewide Advisory Group supervising implementation, said, "The Davis administration hatched a flawed plan for realignment and then failed to admit its own mistakes. That caused the whole package to be delayed. But in no other area of proposed realignment did the governor face the buzzsaw he faced with Prop. 36."

"Gov. Davis saw a major legal challenge on the horizon," Zimmerman said, "and unified opposition from a wide range of people concerned with Prop. 36. It is fair to say the governor finally blinked. Realigning Prop. 36 was a bad idea, and it seems now to be a dead idea. I sincerely doubt we will see this concept come back."

In January, after Gov. Davis first proposed "realignment" of Prop. 36 programs, supporters complained that the move would end voter-guaranteed treatment funding, state oversight and evaluation of the law's impact. In late April, the Office of Legislative Counsel cast grave doubt on the legality of realignment, given the clear mandates of Prop. 36 and the fact that the law's appropriations are not subject to the budget process. On May 1, a Senate budget subcommittee voted unanimously against realignment of Prop. 36 and all alcohol and drug treatment programs.

Whitney Taylor, director of Prop. 36 implementation for the Drug Policy Alliance in Sacramento, said, "Ending the threat of realignment means preserving Prop. 36 and all its early successes. For all the discussion of this issue we have seen in Sacramento, this is really a victory for the people on the front lines. We can now reassure them that they can continue to do the work the voters asked them to do - to save lives and save money by treating nonviolent drug users."

###

See more press releases


 
Common Sense for Drug Policy
 
California Society of Addiction Medicine
 
California State Association of Counties
 

Read commentary from Oliver H., a Prop 36 graduate.

 
Get the Facts
Over a dozen Proposition 36 fact sheets are available for download. Topics include: the Effectiveness of Drug Treatment, Drug Courts/Deferred Entry, and the California Correctional System.
 
County-by-County
breakdowns of the 2000 initiative votes
 
For background on the Prop. 36 campaign and other votes nationwide for drug policy reform, see:

Contact Lists
County Lead Agencies
and Contacts
Parole Region Contact
Probation Contacts

 

     

 
HOME | ABOUT PROP 36 | REPORTS | PRESS RELEASES | NEWS | FAQ | TREATMENT NOT JAIL
Drug Policy Alliance · (916) 444-3751 · sacto@drugpolicy.org