Sign up here to
receive our e-alerts





February 12, 2003
E-mail this page to a friend


Prop. 36 Sponsors 'Disappointed' by Davis Plan to Proceed with Realignment

Meeting with Dept. of Finance Confirms Threat to Voter Initiative


Contact: Roberta Green, Campaign for New Drug Policies
310 394-2952, or Tony Newman, Drug Policy Alliance: (510) 208-7711


SACRAMENTO, Feb. 12 -Davis Administration representatives yesterday told Prop. 36 supporters that they plan to proceed with "realignment" of funds and programs begun by the initiative, effectively ending voter-guaranteed funding levels and state oversight of the program.

Bill Zimmerman, executive director of the Campaign for New Drug Policies, said, "Whether or not the governor made a mistake in proposing realignment of Prop. 36 is no longer the issue. It is clear that his administration is moving ahead with this plan despite the many obstacles we have made evident."

Zimmerman continued, "We will now organize a coalition to fight this threat to Prop. 36, and will pursue every avenue available to us to prevent this plan from going forward. The integrity of the voter-approved initiative is at stake."

Prop. 36, which requires drug treatment instead of jail time for first- and second-time nonviolent drug users, was enacted with 61% of the vote in November 2000. To pay for treatment, the measure guarantees $120 million per year from the state general revenue fund, for five and one-half years.

Under the existing budget proposal, state funding would evaporate, to be replaced by unknown amounts of money at the county level from new sales taxes, tobacco taxes, and other revenues. Also, oversight and auditing of local programs by the state Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP) would end, along with required long-term studies of the successes and impacts of Prop. 36.

Whitney Taylor, director of Prop. 36 implementation for the Drug Policy Alliance, said, "Without state oversight, we will soon see Prop. 36 become a third-tier, underfunded local program. A dropoff in treatment quality and diversity is guaranteed. We were disappointed that the governor's staff did not appear to grasp the severe threat their plan poses to a successful, popular, voter-approved law."

Last week, Prop. 36 supporters notified Gov. Davis in an attorney's letter that realignment would violate the ballot measure and "frustrate its implementation."

See more press releases


 
Common Sense for Drug Policy
 
California Society of Addiction Medicine
 
California State Association of Counties
 

Read commentary from Oliver H., a Prop 36 graduate.

 
Get the Facts
Over a dozen Proposition 36 fact sheets are available for download. Topics include: the Effectiveness of Drug Treatment, Drug Courts/Deferred Entry, and the California Correctional System.
 
County-by-County
breakdowns of the 2000 initiative votes
 
For background on the Prop. 36 campaign and other votes nationwide for drug policy reform, see:

Contact Lists
County Lead Agencies
and Contacts
Parole Region Contact
Probation Contacts

 

     

 
HOME | ABOUT PROP 36 | REPORTS | PRESS RELEASES | NEWS | FAQ | TREATMENT NOT JAIL
Drug Policy Alliance · (916) 444-3751 · sacto@drugpolicy.org